<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://smulexicon.com/2026/04/27/constitutionality-of-presumptions-under-the-misuse-of-drugs-act-jumaat-bin-mohamed-sayed-3-ors-v-attorney-general-2025-1-slr-1287-2025-sgca-40/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name></news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-27T14:22:28+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Constitutionality of Presumptions under the Misuse of Drugs Act: Jumaat bin Mohamed Sayed &#038; 3 Ors v Attorney-General [2025] 1 SLR 1287, [2025] SGCA 40</news:title></news:news></url><url><loc>https://smulexicon.com/2026/04/27/trade-mark-infringement-in-the-age-of-internet-advertising-east-coast-podiatry-centre-pte-ltd-v-family-podiatry-centre-pte-ltd-2025-1-slr-914-2025-sgca-28/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name></news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-27T14:14:51+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Trade mark infringement in the age of internet advertising:  East Coast Podiatry Centre Pte Ltd v Family Podiatry Centre Pte Ltd [2025] 1 SLR 914; [2025] SGCA 28</news:title></news:news></url><url><loc>https://smulexicon.com/2026/04/27/sentinels-not-sleuths-a-clarification-of-directors-duties-in-singapore-goh-jin-hian-v-inter-pacific-petroleum-pte-ltd-2025-1-slr-872-2025-sghca-7/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name></news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-27T14:12:43+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>“Sentinels, not Sleuths”: A Clarification of Directors’ Duties in Singapore: Goh Jin Hian v Inter-Pacific Petroleum Pte Ltd [2025] 1 SLR 872; [2025] SGHC(A) 7</news:title></news:news></url></urlset>
